دوره 14، شماره 1 - ( 10-1398 )
جلد 14 شماره 1 صفحات 162-135 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Panahipour S, Arabzadeh M, Kadivar P. The Effect of Self-Construct on Mathematical Performance, Mediated by 3×2 Achievement Goals and Math Self-Efficacy. ijpb 2020; 14 (1) :135-162
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-325-fa.html
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-325-fa.html
Panahipour Sana، Arabzadeh Mehdi، Kadivar Pravin. The Effect of Self-Construct on Mathematical Performance, Mediated by 3×2 Achievement Goals and Math Self-Efficacy. نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی. 1398; 14 (1) :135-162
Department of Educational Psychology Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده: (4239 مشاهده)
The research aimed to investigate the effect of self-construal on mathematical performance, mediated by 3× 2 achievement goals and math self-efficacy. The research sample comprised of 400 students who were selected via multi-stage sampling from a high schools located in Karaj—a city in Iran. The research tools included revised self-construal scale, 3×2 achievement goal questionnaire, and Mathematic self-efficacy scale. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Findings revealed that the proposed model of the research has acceptable goodness of fit. The analyses revealed that the direct effect of independent self-construal on the math self-efficacy and all the six goal-orientations were significant (p<.05). Moreover, the direct effect of interdependent self-construal on all goal orientations was also significant (p<.05) except for the direct effect of interdependent self-construal on the task-approach and self-approach goals. However, the direct effect of independent and interdependent self-construal on math performance and the direct effect of interdependent self-construal on math self-efficacy were not observed as significant. Bootstrap results show that the indirect effect of independent self-construal on Mathematical Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Performance is significant, and the indirect effect of self-approach on Mathematical Performance is also significant (p<.05).
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
عمومى
دریافت: 1398/7/15 | ویرایش نهایی: 1398/12/23 | پذیرش: 1398/12/26 | انتشار: 1398/10/29
دریافت: 1398/7/15 | ویرایش نهایی: 1398/12/23 | پذیرش: 1398/12/26 | انتشار: 1398/10/29
فهرست منابع
1. Brutus, S., & Greguras, G. J. (2008). Self‐construals, motivation, and feedback seeking behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), 282-291. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00434.x]
2. Butler, R., & Ruzany, N. (1993). Age and socialization effects on the development of social comparison motives and normative ability assessment in kibbutz and urban children. Child Development, 64(2), 532-543. [DOI:10.2307/1131267]
3. Christopher, M. S., Norris, P., D'Souza, J. B., & Tiernan, K. A. (2012). A test of the multidimensionality of the Self-Construal Scale in Thailand and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(5), 758-773. [DOI:10.1177/0022022111406119]
4. Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131-151. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7]
5. Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142-179. [DOI:10.1177/1088868310373752] [PMID]
6. David, A. P. (2014). Analysis of the separation of task-based and self-based achievement goals in a Philippine sample. Psychological Studies, 59(4), 365-373. [DOI:10.1007/s12646-014-0266-6]
7. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3-6), 487-506. [DOI:10.1080/02643290244000239] [PMID]
8. Diseth, A. (2015). The advantages of task-based and other-based achievement goals as standards of competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 59-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.011]
9. Dowd, S. (2013). The relationship between self-perception and external factors: self-efficacy and self construals.
10. Dowd, S. M., & Artistico, D. (2016). Type and strength of self-construal interact with the influence of anchoring heuristics in appraisals of self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 400-405. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.018]
11. Dull, R. B., Schleifer, L. L. F., & McMillan, J. J. (2015). Achievement goal theory: The relationship of accounting students' goal orientations with self-efficacy, anxiety, and achievement. Accounting Education, 24(2), 152-174. [DOI:10.1080/09639284.2015.1036892]
12. Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12(6), 505-510. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9280.00393] [PMID]
13. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632. [DOI:10.1037/a0023952]
14. Emmett, J., Hall, D., & McKenna, C. (2013). Exposing the roots of low self-efficacy for math: A multi-case study of students in an urban middle school. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 8(2), 3.
15. Engle, P., Grantham-McGregor, S., Black, M., Walker, S. P., & Wachs, T. D. (2009). How to avoid the loss of potential in over 200 million young children in the developing world. Child Health and Education, 1(2), 58-72.
16. Grigg, S., Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Svetleff, Z. (2018). Relations among math self efficacy, interest, intentions, and achievement: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 73-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.007]
17. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 261-273.
https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.3.0261 [DOI:10.2307/749515]
18. Hall, M., & Ponton, M. (2002). A comparative analysis of mathematics self-efficacy of developmental and non-developmental freshman mathematics students. In the 2002 Meeting of Louisiana/Mississippi Section of the Mathematics Association of America, Mississippi. Citeseer.
19. Hamilton, R. W., & Biehal, G. J. (2005). Achieving your goals or protecting their future? The effects of self-view on goals and choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 277-283. [DOI:10.1086/432237]
20. Hardin, E. E., Leong, F. T. L., & Bhagwat, A. A. (2004). Factor structure of the self-construal scale revisited: Implications for the multidimensionality of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 327-345. [DOI:10.1177/0022022104264125]
21. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903] [PMID]
22. Huang, C. (2016). Achievement goals and self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 119-137. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.002]
23. Kam, C., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., & Ho, M. Y. (2012). Examining the dimensionality of self-construals and individualistic-collectivistic values with random intercept item factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 727-733. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.023]
24. Kitayama, S., King, A., Yoon, C., Tompson, S., Huff, S., & Liberzon, I. (2014). The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) moderates cultural difference in independent versus interdependent social orientation. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1169-1177. [DOI:10.1177/0956797614528338] [PMID]
25. Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245] [PMID]
26. Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205-230. [DOI:10.1080/00207590344000330]
27. Kononovas, K., & Dallas, T. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of perceived stress and self-efficacy across Japanese, US and Lithuanian students. Psichologija, 39, 59-70. [DOI:10.15388/Psichol.2009.0.2594]
28. Kung, H. Y., & Lee, C. Y. (2016). Multidimensionality of parental involvement and children's mathematics achievement in Taiwan: Mediating effect of math self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 266-273. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.004]
29. Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese heart and mind for wanting to learn. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 248-269. [DOI:10.1177/0022022102033003003]
30. Luo, W., Hogan, D. J., Yeung, A. S., Sheng, Y. Z., & Aye, K. M. (2014). Attributional beliefs of Singapore students: Relations to self-construal, competence and achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 154-170. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2013.785056]
31. Luo, W., Hogan, D., & Paris, S. G. (2011). Predicting Singapore students' achievement goals in their English study: Self-construal and classroom goal structure. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 526-535. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.002]
32. Luo, W., Hogan, D., Tan, L. S., Kaur, B., Ng, P. T., & Chan, M. (2014). Self construal and students' math self concept, anxiety and achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 184-195. [DOI:10.1111/ajsp.12058]
33. Luo, W., & Yeung, A. S. (2016). Self-construal, incremental beliefs of ability, and learning preferences of Singapore students. The Psychology of Asian Learners (pp. 593-606). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_36]
34. Luo, W., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Self-efficacy, achievement goals, and achievement: academic help-seeking tendencies as mediators. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1).
35. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224] [PMCID]
36. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420-430. [DOI:10.1177/1745691610375557] [PMID]
37. Matos, L., Lens, W., Vansteenkiste, M., & Mouratidis, A. (2017). Optimal motivation in Peruvian high schools: Should learners pursue and teachers promote mastery goals, performance-approach goals or both? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 87-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.02.003]
38. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925] [PMID]
39. Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710]
40. Ning, H. K. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the 3× 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a Hong Kong Sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(3), 261-272. [DOI:10.1177/0734282916677658]
41. Shafizadeh, M. (2007). Relationships between goal orientation, motivational climate and perceived ability with intrinsic motivation and performance in physical education university students. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(19), 2866-2870. [DOI:10.3923/jas.2007.2866.2870]
42. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591. [DOI:10.1177/0146167294205014]
43. Singelis, T. M. (2000). Some thoughts on the future of cross-cultural social psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 76-91. [DOI:10.1177/0022022100031001007]
44. Sins, P. H. M., Van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students' achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004]
45. Suryaningrum, C. (2018). The Correlation of Self-Construal, Self-Efficacy, and Emotional Regulation Strategy as Cultural Factors with Social Anxiety: Preliminary Study. In 3rd ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH 2017). Atlantis Press. [DOI:10.2991/acpch-17.2018.36]
46. Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Sun, Y., & Chua, L. L. (2017). Psychometric properties of the 3×2 achievement goal questionnaire for sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(5), 460-474. [DOI:10.1080/1612197X.2016.1142458]
47. Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism-collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 355-366. [DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10]
48. Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Cortina, K. S. (2005). Motives, goals, and adaptive patterns of performance in Asian American and Anglo American students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 141-158. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2004.11.003]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
